> Institutions are uncoordinated. There isn’t an ‘holistic approach’ to get entrepreneurs inspired and then up and running. Instead, there is a gap between grassroots energy and the business environment, which is exacerbated by a cultural stubbornness to encourage or support entrepreneurship.
> Too much ‘red tape’ in education means that it fails to ‘bring to the surface’ the natural endowments needed by entrepreneurs to progress. Examples were given where red tape, such as CRB checks, made it impossible for schools to hold talks that could inspire students. When red tape inhibits the encouragement of one's natural ability to be ‘entrepreneurial’, the culture of entrepreneurship is severely diminished.
> University is too little too late. By the time students get to university it is too late to encourage the ‘culture’ of entrepreneurship. Students often learn within a rigid framework and aren’t able to use the required ‘problem based’ knowledge learned.
> "Soft-Skills" aren’t taught in schools. It was noted that in addition to obstacles within the education system, the teaching in 'soft-skills' is undermined by ‘professional teachers’ who don’t have the background to inspire an entrepreneurial mindset among their students.
Fostering the best conditions for entrepreneurship requires a cultural incentive in addition to an effective set of institutions to support it. The conversation here suggests that in the UK a cultural gap is compounded by a fragmented approach to realising it.
The APPGE will have its formal contribution published later this month.
[1] A number of the Forum's contributors used synonymous terms for these throughout the discussion.
Author: Tom Dunbar of the APPGE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.